What does that even mean? Are you being self-deprecating and saying your book sucks and only has one reader? Or are you making some kind of joke about how unlikely it is that a hot woman is smart enough to read? (Really, she's just there to sell your book, right?)
Someone explain to me how this flippancy is ok. Preferably to my face, if you think you can handle it. Because no one at Giant is commenting on the cover (to be fair, article just went up today). Why does it so often seem like there is no feminist presence in the indie lit community? We get R. Gay writing the occasional piece on how rape is bad even if the NYT doesn't seem to think so, but other than, seems like yet another prick club.
I'm probably just being a crazy, humorless bitch, right? Prick. Stop putting nearly naked women on the covers of your probably-also-sexism-inside books and pretending you're being post-feminist ironic or some crap. You're being a douche, that's all. An unoriginal, dudebro douche. Go read Maxim and high five or something.
PS-Turn-Offs are going to be a regular thang now. We're calling you all out. Will do some Turn-Ons too, don't worry.